not max throughput, and willing to take EA risks, and you have capability fo setting both APs in wired, the best setup in your case is 2 U6-Lites. In the end, if the signal to cost is your primary goal i.e. The last piece, I'd throw in is if you are thinking EA device and even considering the cost of $179, why not other EA UniFi WiFi 6 APs? If you could place them with wired, for 1700 sqft, that should be able to get a solid Wi-Fi throughout home while one AP may not be able to achieve that goal (for sure not with 5G band only). one U6, I'd take nanoHD.īut as you said, the major difference I think comes from the fact you could buy almost two Lites. Max throughput is up to 40% but practical distance, it is ~10% and that's of course only to the devices you got Wi-Fi 6. In real world, Wi-Fi 6 advantage is not that huge. Apple ecosystem is not good for MU-MIMO, but if you have devices capable of MU-MIMO, that's another advantage. Intuitive UniFi Controller Software Configure and manage your APs with the easy-to-learn user interface. While I had other vender flagship Wi-Fi 6 (4x4 MIMO) routers, my only Wi-Fi 6 device, iPhone 11 Pro, only reached 600 Mbps at its best. Powerful Hardware The UniFi nanoHD AP features the latest in Wi-Fi 802.11ac Wave 2 MU-MIMO technology. Majority of clients are 2x2, so it may not affect the actual single device throughput in many homes, but certain homes it does make a difference.įor instance, I have MacBook Pro from 2015 with 3x3 MIMO. One thing about the two is nanoHD uses older Wave 2 technology however, it is 4x4 MIMO.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |